Egypt : Were we slave owners in Ancient Egypt?

[namreh]

From what I have learned in my studies of Egypt, the people who built the oldest of the pyramids were not initially slaves. The slaves came much later during the dynastic periods of Egypt, when there had been race-mixing and a fundamental change in the cosmology/cosmogony of the original Nubian people of the continent. Slavery came about through this perversion of the cosmology, and was practiced as a result by all manner of people during that time. What we have today is a continuation of the same in capitalism, or any form of republic or so-called democracy. I'd say that today, slavery has changed in it's form, but is more prevalent than ever. People actually think they are living in freedom, and this couldn't be further from the truth. Because of this, freedom does not live as it once did with your people, long, long before Moses became a figure of Judaic his-story. The bible must be taken into context with respect to all other esoteric and prolific texts of that time in order to better grasp the story as it was originally told by your people. The Coptic bible is an interesting piece of work, for instance, in comparison to any modern christian translation.

There weren't mixed races in ancient Egypt but they're were different tribes in and out of ancient Egypt. There is no historical documentation which show white people living in ancient Egypt which is what many white people hope to claim. Using such statements as mixed race is a ploy by Eurocentric scholars/liars that would like to give them a place there. What you learned about ancient Egypt as far as slavery goes, you are correct in saying "were not initially slaves".

 

[namreh]

........Welcome back namreh,

With this mythical position you take towards the Bible, are you saying that History escapes the Bible, and if so, how to do explain away archeological finds in direct contradiction of your view?

Peace In,

There are historical events in the bible but they are not attributed to the people called Israelites. Archeological evidence is more Canaanite then anything else. Some of the material that they are calling Israelite finding are in fact Egyptian in nature.

 

[Clyde C Coger Jr]

There are historical events in the bible but they are not attributed to the people called Israelites. Archeological evidence is more Canaanite then anything else. Some of the material that they are calling Israelite finding are in fact Egyptian in nature.

.......Wait a minute namreh,

Previously, you took a different position. Moreover, aren't Canaanites in the Bible, isn't the Bible replete with information concerning Egypt/Egyptians?

Peace In,

 

[namreh]

.......Wait a minute namreh,

Previously, you took a different position. Moreover, aren't Canaanites in the Bible, isn't the Bible replete with information concerning Egypt/Egyptians?

Peace In,

The bible is replete with inaccurate Egyptian and Canaanite history nevertheless a stolen history

 

[Clyde C Coger Jr]

The bible is replete with inaccurate Egyptian and Canaanite history nevertheless a stolen history

.......You've got to be kidding me namreh,

First, you take a mythical position toward the Bible having no historical evidences; and suddenly you admit that History cannot escape the Bible, only to now argue conditions of inaccuracy therein, wow!

Peace In...for real straight-talk, enjoyed the exchanges, tc(take care)